Companies bracing for China’s retaliation in tariffs dispute
By JOE McDONALD AP Business Writer
May 13, 2019 01:38 AM
A woman walks by a bench painted with an American flag outside a fashion boutique selling U.S. brand clothing at the capital city’s popular shopping mall in Beijing, Monday, May 13, 2019. Companies waited Monday to see how China decides to retaliate for President Donald Trump’s latest tariff hike while forecasters warned their escalating fight over technology and trade might disrupt a Chinese economic recovery.
Companies were bracing Monday for how Beijing might retaliate against President Donald Trump’s escalation of a fight over technology and trade that threatens to disrupt a Chinese economic recovery.
Regulators have threatened “necessary countermeasures” for Trump’s tariff hikes Friday on $200 billion of Chinese imports. But three days later, in a break with previous tit-for-tat penalties that were imposed immediately, Beijing had yet to announce what it might do.
A foreign ministry spokesman said Monday that he had no details about Chinese plans or high-level contacts since negotiations ended Friday without a deal.
“We are determined and capable of safeguarding our legitimate rights and interests,” said the spokesman, Geng Shuang. “We hope the United States will meet China halfway to address each other’s legitimate concerns.”
Unlimited Digital Access: Only $0.99 For Your First Month
Get full access to The Bellingham Herald content across all your devices.
China is running out of U.S. imports it could penalize due to the lopsided U.S.-Chinese trade balance. Regulators have been targeting American companies in China by slowing down customs clearance for shipments and processing of business licenses.
Officials appeared to be studying the potential impact on China’s economy before picking their next steps, said Jake Parker, vice president of the U.S.-China Business Council, an industry group. He said officials might be worried companies may shift operations out of China in response to “aggressive retaliatory actions.”
“I assume this goes fairly high within China’s government before retaliatory actions are settled upon,” said Parker.
Forecasters warned that Friday’s hikes could disrupt a Chinese recovery that appeared to be gaining traction. Growth in the world’s second-largest economy held steady at 6.4% over a year earlier in the latest quarter, supported by higher government spending and bank lending.
The tensions “raise fresh doubts about this recovery path,” Morgan Stanley economists Robin Xing, Jenny Zheng and Zhipeng Cai said in a report.
The latest U.S. charges could knock 0.5 percentage points off annual Chinese economic growth, economists said. They said that loss could widen to 1 percentage point if both sides extend penalties to all of each other’s exports. That would pull annual growth below 6%, raising the risk of politically dangerous job losses.
The latest talks ended with no word of progress after Washington accused Beijing of trying to backtrack on earlier commitments.
The chief Chinese envoy, Vice Premier Liu He, told state TV the remaining issues had to do with principles and “we will make no concessions on matters of principle.”
Trump started raising tariffs last July over complaints China steals or pressures companies to hand over technology.
Washington wants Beijing to roll back plans for government-led creation of Chinese global competitors in robotics and other technology that its trading partners say violate its free-trade commitments.
A stumbling block has been U.S. insistence on an enforcement mechanism with penalties to ensure Beijing carries out its commitments. Economists say Chinese leaders probably reject that as a violation of Chinese sovereignty.
Trump’s surprise May 5 tariff announcement renewed anxiety in financial markets about global economic growth.
On Monday, China’s stock market benchmark fell 1.2% and Tokyo’s main index lost 0.7%. Markets in South Korea and Southeast Asia also declined.
Friday’s increase raised U.S. duties on $200 billion of Chinese goods to 25% from 10%. Importers of another $50 billion of Chinese goods already were paying 25%.
Beijing matched Trump’s earlier 25% tariff on $50 billion of American goods. It imposed 10% charges on $60 billion of imports but left other goods unaffected, possibly out of concern for Chinese companies that depend on U.S. technology and components.
UBS economists said they believed Beijing might raise tariffs on $60 billion of U.S. goods and cancel an agreement to postpone a duty increase on imported American autos while the two sides negotiated.
“The risk of a full blown trade war has materially increased,” they said in a report.
The UBS analysts said the next escalation could come in as little as one month as U.S. regulators prepare to follow through on Trump’s threat to extend penalty tariffs to all Chinese goods.
State media tried to reassure Chinese companies and consumers the ruling Communist Party has the resources and policy tools to respond.
“There is nothing to be afraid of,” said the party newspaper People’s Daily. “The U.S.-instigated trade war against China is just a hurdle in China’s development process. It is no big deal.”
Makers of clothing and furniture already were shifting production to Southeast Asia due to rising Chinese wages. Business groups say that exodus is accelerating as some other companies shift production of goods for the U.S. market to other countries. Economists say more might follow to reduce the risk of American tariff hikes.
The abruptness of Trump’s May 5 announcement made companies see doing business in China as more uncertain, said Parker of the U.S.-China Business Council.
No matter what Washington and Beijing decide, “there is an enormous risk in the background that tariffs could come back into play at any moment,” he said.
- Corresponden & leading expert at Washington, D.C. news
- Former reporter at Miami Herald
- Studied at Stanford University
- Went to Finlay DR Carlos J Elementary School
- Lives in Washington, District of Columbia
- From Miami, Florida
Is a national and foreign correspondent based in D.C. She files investigative reports and covers breaking news on a range of topics, including corruption, police shootings, etc. Before joining the TimWorld in 2018, she worked at the Miami Herald. She was a John S. Knight fellow at Stanford University.